Just a data point for Robin Hanson. When I was one of a large integrating group of black students at what had been a largely white prep school in 1974, I heard a lot of presumptions about 'what you people have been through' that was already part of the assumptions that got us invited to integrate in the first place.
At a high level of society where certain indignities are met with rage, invective and recourse (imagine what might happen if you called Secretary of State Hilary Clinton 'a dumb cunt'), I perceived an interesting dualism. The primary civil gesture is a kind of condescending sympathy towards those insulted. "My dad is a bank president, if somebody treated him like a nigger, heads would roll". On the other hand there is an upper class burden on becoming conduct that blacks were presumed not to assume. So our stiff upper lips were discounted in that same backhanded way. "You're actually lucky; you have no idea how hard it is to deal with men like my father." That whole slumming Bullworth vibe, and racial authenticity establishes a kind of class double standard.
I raise this because there is a seemingly permanent dissonance over matters of racism in 'high' and 'low' races because the rage, invective and recourse of the low race is privileged - and it's easy to do so when the expected prizes are faits accompli for the high race. So anytime a black man in NYC is snubbed for a cab, it's OK to complain and have this insult as representative of the pain of racisms attack on dignity and social mobility.
So long as the rage and invective don't require recourse to the very source of the high race's power, then the double standard is acceptable. And for the most part this has been the case, because the level of power deemed acceptable to a racially weighted negotiation has been relatively low. I always make mention that the SCLC once gathered 15,000 Negroes to the streets to protest inequality that was satiated by the hiring of 3 to be cashiers in a Southern drugstore. Today the same kind of legitimated 'black rage' asks for a 575 million dollar forfeiture of a pro sports team.
There is no open market dialog that sets the price of racism. Each team gins up their own numbers and makes gestures of obeisance to totems like 'Affirmative Action' or NAACP Image Awards or the word 'diversity'.
I say there are two camps in America. Those who wish for matters of justice to hold NO regard to race, and those who prefer 'social justice' with SPECIFIC regard to race. The latter camp thinks they have the set the perfect price, but they have no idea.
Trackback to Hanson