These days I read books strictly for pleasure. As a young adult, I always had some pang of guilt if I wasn't reading a book that I thought was important or significant in some way. I also had a rather circumspect personal life, and quite frankly I enjoyed reading at home a lot more than meeting the kinds of people I mostly ended up meeting.
I've always had a love-hate relationship with my intellectual curiosity. That is because I always ended up satisfying it, and having done so removed myself from the social sphere of people I knew. I have never known anyone - or had an active social life with anyone who read the same things I did, and I always felt that every new page I turned was a step into further isolation. It was very difficult being me at the time. I was unmoderated because I was always trying to be what I knew.
That was then.
Today, my guilt twinges me ever so slightly when I think about various classic pieces of literature I have yet to read. And yet I was only recently comforted even more by a lecture by Dr. Larry Arnn who said that the most intelligent man he ever knew said it's useless to try to know much about any more than one thing. So the very idea of broadmindedness is, perhaps, a survival skill of the mediocre. Enough of that.
Cryptonomicon
This is by far my absolute favorite book. I came upon it entirely by accident having given up entirely on the genre of science fiction. A friend recommended it and I could not put it down. Only Foucault's Pendulum before it had the sweep and scope of it, and I found it a great kind of secret revelation of the sort I am most fond - given my fascination with nukes. As an IT guy, I found various aspects of it perfectly riveting. Anyway great, great book. Top shelf of my bookcase.
Underworld
You may be coming to see a pattern here, and I suppose there is. I have mentioned before that I truly dig big fat historical fictions. The only thing better are histories themselves. Unfortunately, most writers of history, well all I've seen, are fairly boring. DeLillo, however, tells a ripping great story with, I think, the mind of the modern American man rightly nailed. If yesterday's man was something like characters of Updike, then today's belong to DeLillo. And yet DeLillo has gone completely off my radar. I haven't had the passion to read him other than that one work. I wish, I suppose, one could combine the narrative skill of DeLillo with the flair for the factual of McPhee. That would be a hell of a stunning writer. Maybe when I'm 60.
Overworld
Bracketing DeLillo's mastery of the internal is my most favorite of the external, Kolb. I think there is, perhaps, no greater adventure than that of the secret adventure on the geopolitical scene. This is what it looks like to knock about among machers.
The Neveryon Series
I basically asked one day what is the greatest science fiction book of all time. Most people conlucded that Samuel R. Delaney was number one, and so I went to his legendary work. The best thing I can do to describe it is to talk about society on the verge of formalized education. How did it come about? What was the inflection point when learning about things you didn't do every day became something of the province of the ordinary man, as opposed to royalty?
The Pentagon's New Map
This is the best big idea book I've read in a long time. I've been trying to eat up some of those, but neither Kaplan, nor Friedman, nor Gleick have done it for me. I probably will go back and read more Halberstam, but man Thomas PM Barnett is on top of things. I'm actually looking for an economic view of the same things. That search continues.
Also rans of the era:
The Company / Modern Manners / Freakonomics / Confessions of a Street Addict / My Life as a Quant / Quicksilver / The Ender Series / The Prey Series / The Hitchhiker's Guide / Basin and Range / Irons in the Fire / The Diamond Age / Great Apes
Recent Comments